Problem solving is analogous to learning because
each is a process where individuals use their prior experiences and familiar
knowledge in order to make sense of new information they encounter, which
eventually leads to a change in the individuals’ behavior or their capacity to
behave in a future situation. James’ (1962) idea of the law of economy, which
asserts that “in admitting a new body of experience, we instinctively seek to
disturb as little as possible our pre-existing stock of ideas; we always try to
name a new experience in some way that will assimilate it to what we already
know” (p. 78) seems parallel to how most individuals initially attempt to solve
a problem, by relying on previous experiences to some similar problem. However, Pretz, Naples, and Sternberg (2003) acknowledged
that the use of routine ways of thinking-trying to make new information familiar-
can lead problem solvers to approach a problem with “incorrect or misleading
expectations.” The process of learning involves the ability to recognize,
define, and represent problems that occur as a result to new information that
cannot be resolved with the use of routine, or familiar, thinking. Thus, the idea is for individuals to escape their
routine ways of thinking and engage in flexible thinking that will allow them
to consider broader scopes and multiple path ways for solving a problem.
I would imagine that all learning requires problem
solving. Even if individuals happen to unconsciously stumble upon some
information that is not relevant to any problem they are currently trying to
solve, that newly acquired (learned) information could be useful for solving
some future problem they may encounter. Considering the mutual component of both
problem solving and learning-a change in behavior or the capacity to behave-the
newly acquired knowledge has influenced a change in individuals’ capacity to
behave, regardless of whether the new information is being applied to a current
situation or will be applied later.
While thinking about a problem, the first thing that
came to mind is composing an academic paper. Now, this may not seem like an
ideal problem to most individuals, but scholarly writing has always been
anxiety provoking, thus, creating a problem that needed to be solved. A very important aspect of successful writing
is picking a topic that is motivating and interesting. Nodding (2006) suggests
that “you must find something that you really do want that requires your doing
this thing that you would prefer avoid” (p. 19). Picking a topic that is of great interest
to me will allow me to acquire knowledge relevant to something I desire to
learn about while doing something I would rather avoid, but cannot avoid. Furthermore, brainstorming, fractionation, and
incubation are essential to my writing process as well. The ability to write out ideas and discuss them
with other individuals (brainstorm), break the ideas of the paper down in to
smaller, manageable sections (fractionation), and allow myself time away from the paper in order
to think and allow other ideas to subconsciously form (incubation) contributes
to a smoother writing process.
It is almost as if, as Nodding suggests, we are tricking ourselves into doing things we would rather not. Your interest in a certain topic, even paired with the desire to avoid writing a paper, is a reward. By pairing the undesired with the desired, you have changed the representation of your problem in order to reach your goal. It is no longer just a daunting academic paper, but a paper about a topic you enjoy.
ReplyDelete