I enjoyed the material on perception, especially the
visual depictions presented. Pinker (2002) stated, “The mechanisms of perception
go to a lot of trouble to ensure that what we see corresponds to what is
usually out there” (p. 200). While reading James (1962), I ran across the typo “readng”
(p. 79); however, I still read aloud the word “reading” without even paying
attention to what the actual word looked like. My brain registered the correct
reading of the word even with the typo present.
I watched a Lifetime movie over the weekend (Student
Seduction), where the teacher’s actions led to accusations of what appeared to
be inappropriate behavior with a student. Although the teacher meant well by
her nice and helpful demeanor, her actions and the events surrounding the
accusations appeared unfavorable. Of course, she did not do anything wrong; however,
her husband kept saying, “it’s the perception of how things look”. How would Pinker’s statement about perception
relate to or explain how individuals take in and interpret other people’s
actions or behaviors. Is there a difference between how visual depictions, such
as art or optical illusions, are interpreted by the brain and how the perception
of people’s thoughts and/or actions are interpreted?
I've definitely seen that movie, Tia, but don't remember the comment about perception! Gotta love Lifetime movies! That's an interesting question you ask about differences between visual illusions and behavioral perceptions. I have to think about this one!
ReplyDeleteI love that you also caught the typo of "readng!" I also instantly read the word "reading," but it definitely caught my attention!
ReplyDeleteI've seen this movie as well... fun connection!
ReplyDelete