It makes sense to say
that learning depends on memory. We take in so much information in our lifetime
that it seems highly unlikely that every piece of knowledge can be omnipresent.
Therefore, the information has to be categorized and filed away for later use.
Consider putting together a dinette set. It the beginning, it was necessary for
me to read the directions and have the directions present during each step of
assembling the furniture. A week later, I put together the last chair and I no
longer needed the directions. I knew where each piece belonged and in what
order each step was supposed to be performed. In this particular situation, it
seems appropriate to credit my knowledge of furniture assembly to memory. How else
would I know how to assemble the chair after an extended period of time without
referring back to the instructions?
I would like to think
that something has been learned even if it cannot be remembered. I thought
about how learning occurs when connections are made between new and old
knowledge. It is possible that what was learned cannot be remembered because a
strong enough connection was not made between the new knowledge and existing
knowledge; therefore, it did not stick in the person’s memory as strongly. On
the other hand, even if some cue or prompt has been presented and the material
taught still cannot be remembered, it is possible that the material was never
learned in the first place. I just believe this is not going to always be the
case. For instance, consider song lyrics. A person can sing an entire song and
there can still be some words that are hard to recall. This does not mean that
the song was never learned, it just shows that some words can easily be
forgotten.
When
I think about the ease or difficulty of retrieving information, I think about
the Law of Use and the Law of Disuse. We use certain pieces of information more
often than other pieces, and many of the things that we are taught can easily
be forgotten if we are not putting it into use on a consistent basis. For
example, there are certain components of math that are used more often than
others. I use simple math (e.g. addition, subtraction, multiplication, and
division) more often than trigonometry. Thus, it is harder for me to retrieve
information pertinent to trigonometry because I rarely use it.
Overall,
I believe storage and the retrieval of knowledge comes down to the strength of
connections that are made and how much knowledge is put into use. Regardless of
whether memories can be verbalized or not, the memories can still be present. There
may be some memory that individuals wish to forget; therefore, they may choose
not to recall it verbally, but it does not mean that the memory has been
forgotten. Moreover, the connections that are tied to specific memories are the
very reason why it is so easy for individuals to remember the very things they
wish to forget. The stronger the connection or the more connections that are
made to a specific piece of knowledge, the more readily available the material
will be for retrieval.
You've raised some excellent points and examples here, Tia. Well done.
ReplyDelete